October 3, 2015 Subject:
Comment on the last review
I found the selection offered to be very "listenable".
As recordings prior to 1925 were made through a horn ("acoustic") most were considerably worse than the subject recording. In my experience, I was surprised at the quality of this rendition.
February 11, 2010 Subject:
It is both sad and upsetting that someone would take a track like this, and then process it in such a way as to completely destroy the original audio. I'd be hard-pressed to come up with a worse example of a track that was more muddied and muffled. To whomever uploaded this track, please do us all a favor and never do it again. If you paid anything for the audio software you used to completely butcher this track, for God's sake, get a refund.